The outrage following congressman Todd Atkins’ comments about “legitimate rape” was racked up again when he corrected himself (sic):
I was talking about forcible rape. I used the wrong word.
For those latecomers, the controversy began with an interview in which Atkins’ compounded his oxymoronic thinking with the purely moronic:
During the interview for KTVI-TV on Sunday, Mr Akin was asked about his no-exceptions view on abortion, a highly charged issue in the US, and on whether he would like abortion to be banned even if the pregnancy was the result of rape.
He replied: “It seems to me, from what I understand from doctors, that is really rare.
“If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
“But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something: I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be of the rapist, and not attacking the child.”
(Source: BBC News, Video courtesy FOX 2 KTVI)
Note that Atkins sits on the House Committee on Science, the one that believes in magical ladyparts and leprechauns.
Atkins’ clarification today is not intended to be a correction in meaning — it’s just replacing one offensive oxymoron with another, possibly worse –, rather it is a crude attempt to reattach himself to Romney leadership that had tried, half-heartedly, to distance itself from his statements. “Forcible rape” was the term used in a bill, co-sponsored by Atkins and (wait for it, Romney VP nominee) Paul Ryan, from last year that in name attempted to block taxpayers funding abortions, but in fact tried to redefine rape by excluding cases where the victim might be under the influence of alcohol or drugs … or be mentally handicapped.
How does one even begin to respond to this?
Perhaps satire is the only way:
|The Daily Show with Jon Stewart||Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c|
|Rape Victim Abortion Funding|